recommended reading

Report: Joint U.S.-China Aviation Ventures Are More Prone to Cyber Intrusions than U.S. Firms


This story was updated Thursday for clarification, after one of the report's co-authors provided new information. Not all of the companies reporting "attacks" were successfully attacked. 

American aerospace firms jointly operated by Chinese companies are nearly two and a half times more at risk of cyberespionage than U.S. enterprises -- but the Chinese government is not the likely perpetrator, according to a draft report set for release on Monday. 

Out of 11 companies with Chinese and U.S. interests, 64 percent reported suffering attempted or successful intellectual property theft, including Alcoa, Boeing Co., General Electric, Honeywell, Pratt & Whitney, Rockwell Collins, and Sikorsky. 

Of 11 American companies with no Chinese stakes, only three reported attempts to steal data or data actually stolen: Gulfstream, Lockheed Martin Corp. and Orbital Sciences Corp. Gulfstream and Lockheed maintain offices in China, but not Orbital Sciences. 

The preliminary report, reviewed by Nextgov, explains: With a hand in most of the nation state's businesses, "the Chinese government is the least likely suspect because they already have access to the U.S. partner’s technology."  Email, mobile, landline and satellite communications typically are monitored by China authorities. 

In contrast, cyber robberies often grab a lot of useless data, indicating an outsider was responsible, such as a criminal enterprise or another foreign country keen on the same technologies. "A network breach is an attack with a blunt instrument that takes time and resources, and often involves indiscriminate file capture and exfiltration rather than the precision of an insider," the draft states.

It is "much easier" for China to obtain what it wants from joint ventures "via technical and insider means than via hacking," said report co-author Jeff Carr, a cyberwarfare researcher and founder of security consultancy Taia Global. Carr often warns against overestimating the Chinese cyber threat. 

The study is expected to be shared with industry next week during an American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics forum.

The authors also included a former officer from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing and a former fellow at George Washington University's Cybersecurity Policy and Research Institute.  

Findings were derived from public information, such as a 2012 Pentagon Defense Security Service Counterintelligence Directorate analysis, a 2011 RAND Corp. study, and disclosures by victimized companies. 

Cyberattack attempts aimed at disrupting national airspace activities were not analyzed. No such network attacks on U.S. aviation critical infrastructure have been divulged. 

Carr added on Thursday that the joint-venture companies experiencing cyber threats usually reported the attackers were unsuccessful. "These companies have defended against cyberattacks whose goal may have been stealing their [intellectual property]," he said. "While the goal of an attack is usually to steal IP rather than create disruption or sabotage, the specific goals for each attack reported aren't known." 

(Image via Gts/

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.