recommended reading

New Jersey email votes shouldn’t be counted yet, experts say

Julio Cortez/AP

The mere mention of email voting conjures nightmares in which supporters manipulate outcomes by misrepresenting themselves as multiple personas or casting votes on behalf of nonsupporters, but in New Jersey, where post-hurricane digital voting is sanctioned, fraudsters likely will not dent the presidential results.

The nonswing state may be better off, on principle, by postponing the vote count to ensure each resident is represented, some election security experts say.

“In general, email and fax voting is probably the most vulnerable to interception, to changing,” said Joseph Lorenzo Hall, senior staff technologist at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a civil liberties group. “Emails are glorified postcards.”

Already, presumably nonmalicious Internet glitches are occurring. Emails to election officials are bouncing back and organizers are directing residents experiencing technical difficulties to contact their personal webmail accounts, according to Ars Technica.

New Jersey law requires residents to mail in paper duplicates of their e-ballots by Nov. 19, as an anti-fraud safeguard. It is unclear, however, if the state will wait until officials have cross-checked paper and digital votes to call the election.

“People don’t necessarily understand that delayed voting results are a good thing,” said Hall. “By definition, if they don’t match they do not count.”

Less than a week before Election Day, Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno permitted voters displaced by Hurricane Sandy to request last-minute absentee ballots by fax or email. Polling stations on Tuesday are transmitting digital ballots and residents have until 8:00 p.m. to send in their votes electronically.

“In New Jersey’s case, it makes sense,” said Hall, who until September was a research fellow at New York University, which like New Jersey was devastated by flooding, power losses and downed critical infrastructure.

The criteria for qualifying as a displaced voter were not defined in the lieutenant governor’s directive. The thinking is that some unaffected residents will vote remotely for convenience or because their polling places are inaccessible.

“Who is a displaced voter? My friend who is lazy and just wants to vote from his house?” Hall mused. 

Update: After voters overwhelmed email operations, New Jersey state officials extended the period for transmitting an e-ballot to election officials until 8 p.m. Friday. However, residents were cut off from requesting e-ballots at 5 p.m. Tuesday. The hiccups preceding this decision included emails to government accounts that bounced back as well as staff failing to send e-ballots to voters who properly emailed requests earlier in the day. 

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen laptop

3.7M Hong Kong Voters' Personal Data Stolen

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.