recommended reading

House Votes to Halt Obama's Plan to Give Up Internet Authority

Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill.

Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill. // Susan Walsh/AP

The House approved an amendment Thursday that would delay the Obama administration's plan to give up oversight of certain technical Internet management functions.

In a 245-177 vote, the House attached the legislation to the annual defense authorization bill. Seventeen Democrats joined the Republicans in approving the measure. The House then voted to pass the full defense bill, which included a number of other amendments.

Republicans fear the administration's plan could allow Russia, China, or other authoritarian regimes to seize new powers over the Internet and even censor websites.

The amendment would require the Government Accountability Office to study the issue before the Commerce Department could give up its contractual authority over the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers—the nonprofit group that manages the technical procedures that allow computers worldwide to connect to websites. The transfer of authority over ICANN to the "global Internet community" is scheduled to take place next year.

The language of the amendment matches a bill, the Dotcom Act, which was approved by the House Energy and Commerce Committee earlier this month.

In a statement, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton warned that "Russia, China, and Iran would like nothing more than to wrest control of the Internet." He argued that the administration should "hit the pause button and allow for independent review" of its plan.

Democrats argue that the transition is part of the long-standing position of the United States to support the "multi-stakeholder" model of Internet governance, in which decisions are made by an array of nonprofits, companies, academics, and engineers.

In a letter earlier this month opposing the Dotcom Act, a top Commerce Department official said that the transition will strengthen the multi-stakeholder model and undercut authoritarian regimes that are arguing for more government control of the Internet.

Kelly Welsh, the department's general counsel, said the bill "sends the wrong signal to the global Internet community" and "reinforces the misapprehension that the U.S. government 'controls' the Internet."

He emphasized that the U.S. won't complete the power transfer until ICANN outlines a plan for Internet management that is free from control by any government.

But Rep. John Shimkus, an Illinois Republican and the author of the amendment, maintained that there's no way to control ICANN once the U.S. gives up its role.

"Once our authority is gone, it's gone for good," he said.

Senate Democrats are expected to oppose the amendment, but the defense bill is considered "must-pass" legislation.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.