recommended reading

Why Federal IT Reform Is Getting Cheaper

 House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., right, reacts to Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va.

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., right, reacts to Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. // J. Scott Applewhite/AP

The latest plans to overhaul how the government buys and manages information technology are significantly less expensive than the ideas that circulated last year, according to nonpartisan projections.

The version of the Federal IT Acquisition Reform Act currently making its way through the Senate would cost $30 million over five years, according to a new estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. That’s far less than the $145 million CBO projected last November for similar legislation.

The pricier FITARA would have established a central collaboration center to advise agencies on their IT procurements. Participating departments would have paid for this through fees that currently go elsewhere, but CBO still estimated the government would need to spend an additional $18 million a year for it, or about $80 million of the $145 million projection for nearly five years.

The center was stripped from both the Senate bill and the most recent version to pass the House. Even without it, the Senate version, which is somewhat truncated, still looks cheaper, according to estimates.  

But Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., warned against putting too much stock in CBO projections, which he said have an unenviable track record for accuracy. “They often dismiss savings because they claim that they can’t measure them,” he said in an interview.

The government budgets about $80 billion a year for IT.

“The bill isn’t in place and we can’t see yet how it will effectuate savings and efficiencies,” he said. “But if it does, which is the whole point of this, you’re talking about potentially billions of dollars every year.”

Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., who introduced his chamber's legislation with Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., told Nextgov he is hopeful his bill will be taken up by the full Senate soon.

Connolly and Darrell Issa, R-Calif., bipartisan sponsors of the House version, both expressed to Nextgov confidence the Senate and House measures could be reconciled.

“The differences are certainly resolvable,” said a spokesman for the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

The House bill had the backing of industry, according to Trey Hodgkins, senior vice president for the public sector at the Information Technology Industry Council.

“We supported the Senate version of the bill, too, but we believe they should add back some of what they took out,” he said, citing language to improve the acquisition workforce and facilitate the move to cloud computing.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.