recommended reading

New GSA Offering Could Avert the Next Conference Scandal


The General Services Administration is considering building a menu of contractors offering services that can help agencies avoid the sort of conference spending scandals that rocked GSA itself in 2012, according to solicitation documents posted Tuesday.

Contractors listed on the menu would help centralize agencies’ conference and meeting spending in unified databases, ensure competitive pricing for conference-related purchases, minimize the risk of cancellation fees from hotels and food vendors and archive important information to pass along to GSA and government watchdogs, the request for information said.

Vendors also should demonstrate how their management has saved the government money through lowered prices and increased efficiency, GSA said.

The proposal stems from Office of Management and Budget directives following the April 2012 conference spending scandal that led to the resignation of top GSA officials including Administrator Martha Johnson. GSA’s 2010 Western Regions conference at the M Resort Spa Casino in Las Vegas cost the agency more than $800,000. It featured a mind reader, $4 shrimp and an award-winning music video that seemed to parody the conference’s own lavish spending.

The directives instructed agencies to review all conference policies and required approval by senior officials for any spending over $100,000. OMB prohibited spending more than $500,000 on a single conference.

Tuesday’s document is a request for interested vendors to describe the services they might offer under a meetings management program contract and doesn’t commit the government to purchasing any services. If GSA moves forward with the project, meetings management would become a special item number on GSA’s Schedule 599 for Travel Services Solutions.

A schedule is essentially a menu of services GSA has already vetted and negotiated that other agencies can purchase for a set price rather than negotiating themselves. Special item numbers are collections of related services offered within a schedule. 

(Image via hxdbzxy/

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.