recommended reading

U.S. officials refuse to sign new U.N. telecom treaty

Osamu Honda/AP file photo

American officials announced on Thursday they won’t be signing an international telecommunications treaty because of concerns it condones government control of the Internet.

A team of about 100 U.S. negotiators have spent the past two weeks at a meeting of the United Nations International Telecommunications Union in Dubai. Officials had feared that countries such as Russia could use the negotiations over international telecom regulations to extend government rules to cover the Internet.

Such changes were kept out of the binding portions of the new treaty, but a majority of the countries chose to include statements on Internet governance in a nonbinding resolution, Ambassador Terry Kramer, who led the U.S. delegation, told reporters on Thursday.

“The U.S. cannot sign the revised telecom treaty in its current form,” he said.

Countries that favor expanding the regulations to the Internet will likely sign the new treaty on Friday, but America won’t be a signatory. “We cannot be part of that consensus,” Kramer said.

The United States and some other countries objected to proposals that would have expanded the regulations to cover things such as cybersecurity and spam. 

The objectionable portion of the treaty will not be binding on the U.S., and the countries that want more government control of the Internet already take such steps.

Despite deciding not to sign the treaty, Kramer painted the two weeks of negotiations as a success because the binding portions remain limited to traditional telecom networks. U.S. officials also succeeded in defeating proposals that could have changed the way Internet companies pay for traffic.

American trade groups, companies, and policymakers were less than pleased.

While praising the U.S. delegation, Republican Federal Communications Commissioner Robert McDowell said the new trend, if unchecked, will harm investment and innovation in the Internet.

“Even though the United States refused to sign the new agreement, what happened today in Dubai could have ripple effects here at home,” he said in a statement. “Consumers everywhere will ultimately pay the price for this power grab as engineers and entrepreneurs try to navigate this new era of an internationally politicized Internet.”

The Internet Association, which represents companies including Google, Yahoo, and Facebook, criticized the U.N. for moving “under the cover of darkness” close to regulating the Internet.

“The ITU efforts tonight may forever alter the free and open multistakeholder governance model under which the Internet has thrived,” the group said in a statement.

Both the House and Senate passed resolutions calling on the U.S. to oppose any effort to expand U.N. regulation of the Internet.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.