recommended reading

IT projects may not be getting enough oversight

The White House should do a better job of tracking whether agencies’ major technology projects are at risk of going off the rails and agencies should perform more oversight on their operations and maintenance spending, according to two recent watchdog reports.

The first report, released publicly by the Government Accountability Office Friday, noted that agency chief information officers were more likely to rate their IT investments as low or moderately low risk than high or moderately high risk on the government’s IT Dashboard. The government’s largest technology spender, the Defense Department, listed all of its investments as low or moderately low risk, GAO said.

The IT Dashboard was launched in 2009 as part of President Obama’s open government initiative. Agency CIOs were forced to attest to the riskiness of investments as part of an effort to raise accountability for large IT projects, which have a history of running over budget and past deadline.

The GAO report did not directly assert agency CIOs are being overly optimistic. It recommended, however, that the Office of Management and Budget evaluate trends in CIO ratings and performance and present them along with the president’s annual budget submission. The report also recommended that the Defense Department reconsider its process for evaluating risk in IT projects.

The second GAO report, released publicly Thursday, found agencies were not sufficiently measuring the performance of ongoing IT investments and so may be missing out on potential savings.

Collectively, the Defense, Veterans Affairs and Treasury departments did not evaluate the performance of 23 major ongoing investments that have annual budgets totaling $2.1 billion, GAO said.

The Homeland Security and Health and Human Services departments evaluated some of their ongoing investments but did not evaluate others and did not use all of the criteria OMB recommended, GAO said. 

(Image via Minerva Studio/

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.