recommended reading

Google’s Search Juggernaut Is Showing Some Cracks

Virginia Mayo/AP

The numbers: Google reported first quarter net income of $3.45 billion, slightly up on last year, but well shy of consensus estimates for $4.3 billion, according to FactSet. Revenue was $15.4 billion, up 19% on last year, but only $12.2 billion once commissions paid to partners for traffic were taken out. FactSet expectations were for revenue of $12.4 billion, after the partner commissions. With a miss on both profit and revenue, Google shares have sunk by about 6% in after-hours trade.

Google-quarterly-results-Profit-Gross-revenue_chartbuilder

The takeaway: The average cost per click for advertisements (a measure of how much Google charges advertisers in its auction-based systems) fell by 9% during the quarter, while traffic acquisition costs—the amount it pays to partners for traffic (for example to Apple for default Google searches via the Safari browser on iPhones) rose to $3.23 billion compared to $2.96 billion a year ago. While Google has expanded aggressively in recent years into businesses as diverse as smartphone operating systems and self-driving cars, very profitable search advertising has remained the core of its business. The latest earnings show the prices it can command there dropping and its costs to bring in that search ad revenue rising, which could prove challenging if extended over time.

What’s interesting: “We got lots of product improvements done, especially on mobile,” Google CEO Larry Page said in the earnings press release. Investors are wondering whether Google’s search business will be as much of a juggernaut amid the transition away from PCs to mobile devices. But the only mentions of mobile in the earnings release thereafter were about the accounting treatment for Motorola Mobile, the handset business which Google sold to Lenovo in January.

Reprinted with permission from Quartz. The original story can be found here

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Spear-phishing

Researchers: Bank-Targeting Malware Sales Rise in Dark Web Markets

See threatwatch report

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.